Showing posts with label Althouse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Althouse. Show all posts

Monday, April 18, 2011

Wisconsin...

I have a picture in my mind (or used to) of Wisconsin being populated by polite and well-mannered people.  Like Miller Place.  Now, look at this video posted by Ann Althouse on her blog of Sarah Palin's Tax Day/TEA Party speech in Madison, WI on Saturday:


About 2 minutes in there is extensive video of a guy screaming "shame, shame" while hiding his face and attempting to stop the filming.  The crowd is doing it best to drown out Palin.  They only want one viewpoint heard -- theirs. So much for free speech.  Heck, so much for common courtesy! 

This is what the left and the unions do -- they shout down, browbeat and attempt to intimidate their opposition.  They use these tactics rather than debate because their positions have very little merit.  Will we see this type of behavior in Miller Place?  We are starting to.  At the last board meeting, the teacher's union president spat out a "thank you' to one of the board trustees who had the temerity to point out that maybe the deal worked out with the teachers was not a good one for the district's long-term fiscal health.  Rather than counter his detailed arguments she accused him of bad faith, said that she was not about to take a vow of poverty (I don't remember that be discussed), and then stormed away from the microphone, to the applause of the teachers assembled in the auditorium.

The country/state/county/pick one is BROKE.  There is no more money.  The public employees must realize that the people who pay their salaries, pensions and benefits are tapped out.  They don't want to hear it, though, let alone understand that it is true. So, the public employee unions are channeling their inner two-year-olds and covering their ears and yelling  I CAN'T HEAR YOU (just like in the video).  In the long run it is not going to work, but we are in for a few years of this stuff.  Madison is now; Miller Place is teed up for the (near) future.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

R.I.P. Flip video camera (2007-2011)

Why did Cisco kill the Flip video camera, a brand they paid $509MM for in 2009?  Some analysts have said it is because margins on the cameras have dropped significantly due to competition and the advent of HD video being built into smart phones.

While this is true, I still see a place for these video cameras, especially the ruggedized and waterproof ones from Kodak and GE.  For citizen journalists -- the regular person who goes to a public meeting and sees something "irregular" -- these cameras are very valuable.  Sometimes things get ugly, like here:



When some goon gets in your face and tries to slap your camera away (skip to about 5:17 in the vid to see my point illustrated), do you want to be holding a $99 Flip or a $$$ smartphone that, if stolen, contains all of your personal data?